133 Ohio App. 3d 685 - McAuley v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2011
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dresher v. Burt · Murphy v. City of Reynoldsburg · State ex rel. Parsons v. Fleming · Pitts v. Ohio Department of Transportation · State ex rel. Adams v. Gusweiler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Only where there is a `total and complete want of jurisdiction' on the part of the inferior court, will such a writ be allowed despite the presence of a remedy by way of appeal. Conversely, if there is no `patent and unambiguous restriction' on the jurisdiction of the court which clearly places the dispute outside its jurisdiction, prohibition will not lie.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.