Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 Ohio App. 3d 821 - Glick v. Glick

133 Ohio App. 3d 821 - Glick v. Glick’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably Johnson v. Johnson (2011), Harris v. Rossi (2018)

37 state decisions

1501999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kaechele v. Kaechele · 119 Ohio App. 3d 155 - Barkley v. Barkley · 83 Ohio App. 3d 559 - Layne v. Layne · 93 Ohio App. 3d 653 - Gullia v. Gullia · 109 Ohio App. 3d 698 - Carman v. Carman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “fair, equitable and in accordance with the law.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`It is reasonable for the spouse whose individual income-producing ability has been enhanced through the contributions of both spouses to assist the *Page 10 other spouse for a period following the divorce to enable that spouse to become self-supporting outside the marriage. If, because of the duration of the marriage, the age of the parties, and the roles played during the marriage, one spouse does not have the resources, ability, or potential to become self-supporting outside the marriage, it is reasonable that the other spouse provides support indefinitely.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`The determination as to when to apply a valuation date other than the actual date of divorce is within the discretion of the trial court and cannot be disturbed on appeal absent a demonstration of an abuse of discretion.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.