Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 P.3d 475 - Asche v. Bloomquist

Asche v. Bloomquist’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation Commission · Miller v. Albright · 109 Wash. 2d 107 - Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply System · State v. Garcia · 119 Wash. 2d 504 - City of Pasco v. Public Employment Relations Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a final determination by a local jurisdiction's body or officer with the highest level of authority to make the determination, including those with authority to hear appeals, on ... [a]n application for a project permit.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Here, the first element ... is met. They lost their view of Mt. Rainier when the Bloomquists began building their house under the permit's authority. The last element is also met. The KCC [Kitsap County Code] provisions do not specify an appeal process for building permits. The closest analogous code provisions indicate that an applicant can appeal ministerial decisions, but it does not provide for appeals by neighbors. Accordingly, there was no administrative process for the Asches to exhaust.” (Citations omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[W]e are constrained to hold that the Asches' due process challenge fails. Having failed to file a land use petition within 21 days of the building permit's issuance, they have lost the right to challenge its validity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.