Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 P.3d 498 - Dickson v. Kates

Dickson v. Kates’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 115 Wash. 2d 609 - State v. Dennison · Hollis v. Garwall, Inc. · 106 Wash. 2d 443 - Smith v. King · 125 Wash. 2d 544 - Berg v. Ting · Hollis v. Garwall, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to determining whether substantial evidence supports the findings and, if so, whether the findings in turn support the trial court's conclusions of law and judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'when there is a sufficient quantum of proof to support the trial court's findings of fact.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.