State v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Roman v. State · Sprague v. State · Allain v. State · Miyasato v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“encompasses more than simply the elements of that crime. Rather, the supreme court meant to authorize conditions of probation that addressed the causes of, or the motivations for, the defendant's criminal behavior. The true test is the alternative formulation contained in the Roman opinion itself: a condition of probation must be”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lambert v. State“reasonable for [the sentencing judge] to conclude that a condition of probation allowing drug searches would further both Thomas's rehabilitation and the protection of the public.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lambert v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.