Marshall v. Rodgers’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
97 federal appellate · 10 district · 37 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedRodgers v. Marshall (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Faretta v. California · Gideon v. Wainwright · United States v. Cronic · Darden v. Wainwright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 260 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“refine or sharpen a general principle of Supreme Court jurisprudence into a specific legal rule that this Court has not announced.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Deck v. Jenkins · Langley v. Prince“[A]n appellate panel may, in accordance with its usual law-of-the-circuit procedures, look to circuit precedent to ascertain whether it has already held that the particular point in issue is clearly established by Supreme Court precedent ....”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.