Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 S. Ct. 2120 - Tarrant Regional Water Dist. v. Herrmann

133 S. Ct. 2120 - Tarrant Regional Water Dist. v. Herrmann’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
4
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedTarrant Regional Water District v. Herrmann (from Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Russello v. United States · Fidelity Federal Savings and Loan Association v. D Cuesta · Arizona v. California · Montana v. United States · Wyeth v. Levine

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Interstate compacts are construed as contracts under the principles of contract law.” Tarrant Regional Water District v. Herrmann, — U.S. —, 133 S.Ct. 2120, 2130 , 186 L.Ed.2d 153 (2013) (citing Texas v. New Mexico, 482 U.S. 124, 128 , 107 S.Ct. 2279 , 96 L.Ed.2d 105 (1987)). Thus, as the Supreme Court instructed in Tarrant”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that States do not easily cede their sovereign powers, including their control over waters within their own territories[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'course of performance under the Compact is highly significant' evidence of [their] understanding of the compact's terms”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.