Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 SE2D 86 - State v. Hereford

State v. Hereford’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2014

14 state decisions

30196319701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on William Marbury v. James Madison · 129 W. Va. 54 - Harbert v. County Court of Harrison County · 129 W. Va. 722 - State Ex Rel. Cosner v. See · Sult v. A. Hochstetter Oil Co. · 147 W. Va. 660 - Rakes v. Ferguson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A statute which provides for a thing to be done in a particular manner or by a prescribed person or tribunal implies that it shall not be done -otherwise or by a different person or tribunal; and the maxim expressio unius est exclusio alterius, the express mention of one thing implies the exclusion of another, applies to such statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.