Prescott v. Erwin’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 1979
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 71 So. 2d 480 - Bartholf v. Baker · 105 So. 2d 915 - Warring v. Winn-Dixie Stores · Saunders v. Kaplan · Chirico v. Dew
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The courts are cautious in granting summary judgments in negligence cases, for negligence is usually for the determination of the jury. Saunders v. Kaplan, Fla.App., 101 So.2d 181 . The burden of proof in a summary judgment is always on the moving party and all doubts must be resolved against him, Chirico v. Dew, Fla.App., 113 So.2d 597 . The movant for summary judgment not only admits the basic facts established that are favorable to the adverse party, but also every conclusion or inference favorable to the adverse party that might be reasonably inferred from the evidence, Warring v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., Fla. App., 105 So.2d 915 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ritter v. Brengle
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.