Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 SO2D 589 - Drew v. Chambers

Drew v. Chambers’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 1995
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 1995

7 state decisions

301961197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vining v. American Bakeries Co. · 105 So. 2d 785 - Alston v. Shiver · 131 So. 2d 24 - Dade National Bank of Miami v. Kay · Ogburn v. Murray

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. All the evidence on which the appellant now relies to show perjury was available to him prior to the trial of this cause. All such evidence could have been employed during the trial to discredit defendant’s testimony if plaintiff had seen fit to use it. No just cause or excuse is shown by this record for plaintiff’s failure to discover this evidence and utilize it at the proper time. Id. at 591 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.