Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 So. 2d 746 - Kiser v. Howard

133 So. 2d 746 - Kiser v. Howard’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 2012

9 state decisions

40196119701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stuart v. Stephanus · 75 So. 2d 696 - Holley v. May · Blackburn v. Florida West Coast Land & Develop. Co. · Euse v. Gibbs · Palmquist v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Real property actions; adverse possession without color of title—When the occupant or those under whom he claims have been in actual continued occupation of real property for seven years under a claim of title exclusive of any other right, but not founded on a written instrument, judgment or decree, the property actually occupied shall be held adversely, if the person claiming adverse possession made a return of the property by proper legal description to the tax assessor of the county where it is located within one year after entering into possession and has subsequently paid all taxes and matured installments of special improvement liens levied against the property by the state county and municipality.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"Where it has been protected by a substantial enclosure. All contiguous land protected by such substantial enclosure shall be deemed to be premises included within the written instrument, judgment, or decree, within the purview of Sec. 95.16." (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.