Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 SO3D 1075 - Chapman v. State

Chapman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dinardo v. State · Morgan v. State · 78 So. 3d 50 - Louisma v. State · Troutman v. State · Martin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““On appellate review of an order requiring a forensic patient to accept involuntary psychotropic treatment, ‘the record must contain competent, substantial evidence to support the trial court’s findings and to substantiate compliance with section 916.107.’ ” The record must contain evidence “that the treatment is deemed necessary by the patient’s multidisciplinary team, that the patient has refused to give express and informed consent as defined in the statute, and that the trial court has considered at least the four factors specified in clauses a-d of section 916.107(3)(a)3.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.