Preston v. Gee’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 390 So. 2d 717 - State v. Arthur · Russell v. State · Robertson v. State · State ex rel. Van Eeghen v. Williams · State ex rel. Hyde v. Thursby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“did not indicate that it intended to change this entrenched rule, or explain the court's reason for doing so, and indeed that question was not at issue in the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thourtman v. Junior“the observation [in Arthur ] that the State's proof must be legally sufficient [only] to sustain a guilty verdict certainly must be treated as dicta”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thourtman v. Junior
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.