133 So. 3d 250 - State v. Dominick’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · State v. Williams · State v. Williams · 80 So. 3d 25 - State v. Hart · 962 So. 2d 459 - State v. Horton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This Court has recognized that "paragraph A of La. R.S. 15:301.1 provides that in instances where the statutory restrictions are not recited at sentencing, they are contained in the sentence, whether or not imposed by the sentencing court." State v. Wyatt , 2011-0219, p. 20 (La. App. 4 Cir. 12/22/11), 83 So.3d 131 , 143 (citing State v. Williams , 20001725 (La. 11/28/01), 800 So.2d 790 ). Accordingly, "this Court need take no action to correct the trial court's failure to specify that the defendant's sentences be served without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence" because it is statutorily effected. State v. Wyatt , 2011-0219, p. 20 , 83 So.3d at 143 (citing La. R.S. 15:301.1(A) ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pittman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.