Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 SW3D 187 - Fitts v. Arms

Fitts v. Arms’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 2010
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Cowden v. Sovran Bank/Central South · Bowman v. Henard · Church v. Perales · White v. Methodist Hospital South

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Summary judgment is properly entered in favor of a party when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Because summary judgment involves only questions of law and not factual disputes, no presumption of correctness attaches to the lower court’s decision. Therefore, on appeal, we review the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine whether the precepts of Rule 56 have been satisfied.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.