Hampton v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
4
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ashe v. Swenson · Griffith v. Kentucky · Huddleston v. United States · Dowling v. United States · Shade v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the witness is not testifying as an expert, the witness' testimony in the form of opinions or inferences is limited to those opinions or inferences which are: (a) Rationally based on the perception of the witness; (b) Helpful to a clear understanding of the witness' testimony or the determination of a fact in issue; and (c) Not based on scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge within the scope of Rule 702.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“did not opine that the signatures on the loan documents were, in fact, forged. Rather, she stated that in her opinion the signatures on the documents and the signature on Wade's driver’s license did not look the same.”). 15 . Eba signed her name as “Eba M. Wilson”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“more inclusionary than exclusionary when the lay witness's opinion is rationally based on the perception of the witness and is helpful to the jury or trial court for a clear understanding of the witness's testimony or the determination of a factual issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.