Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 SW3D 502 - State v. Blocker

State v. Blocker’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
3
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2022

16 state decisions

100200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Edwards · State v. Withrow · State v. Taylor · State v. Dodd · State v. Hall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If a continuance is not likely to result in the presence of the witness at trial, the court will not be held to have abused its discretion in denying the continuance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Each word or phrase in a statute must be given meaning if possible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.