Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 U.S. 152 - Knox County v. Harshman

Knox County v. Harshman’s Empirical Analysis

133 U.S. 152 · 1890

Citation profile

125
cited by 125 later decisions
7
cited 7 times by the Supreme Court
16
states following
July 1956
most recently cited

48 federal appellate · 7 district · 40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 125 later decisions (7 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1956 · most notably Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co. (1944), Marshall v. Holmes (1891)

48 federal appellate · 7 district · 40 state decisions — followed in 16 states

3401890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Phillips v. Negley · The Marine Insurance Company of Alexandria v. Hodgson · Ambler v. Choteau · Thompson v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 125 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A court of equity does not interfere with judgments at law unless the ■complainant has an equitable defense of which he could not avail himself at law, or had a good defense at law which he was prevented from availing himself of by fraud or accident, unmixed with negligence of himself or his agent.””
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““If that return were false, yet, no fraud being charged or proved against the petitioner, redress can be sought at law only, and not by this bill.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.