Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 U.S. 375 - Quebec Co v. Merchant

Quebec Co v. Merchant’s Empirical Analysis

133 U.S. 375 · 1890

Citation profile

97
cited by 97 later decisions
8
cited 8 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
May 1944
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 15 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 97 later decisions (8 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1944 · most notably The Osceola (1903), Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co. (1918)

40 federal appellate · 15 district · 17 state decisions — followed in 11 states

470189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New York Elevated Railroad v. Fifth National Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The case, therefore, falls within the well-settled rule, as to which it is unnecessary to cite cases, which exempts an employer from liability for in juries <to a servant caused by another servant. * * * ””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The carpenter had no authority over the plaintiff, nor had the porter. They and the plaintiff had all signed the shipping articles; and the division into departments was one evidently for the convenience of administration on the vessel, and did not have the effect of causing the porter and the carpenter not to be fellow servants. * * * There was nothing in the employment or service of the carpenter or the porter which made either of them any more the representative of: the defendant than the employment and service of the stewardess made her such representative.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.