Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 VA 741 - Powell v. Commonwealth

Powell v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
7
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Pradlik v. State (1945), Indian Fred v. State (1929)

32 state decisions

601922193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Throckmorton · Dennis v. State · State v. Betsall · Bussey v. State · Commonwealth v. Drew

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In Powell , the Supreme Court, in discussing this rule, said: The courts properly require that it shall be made to appear affirmatively that the new evidence tending to show the mistake or the perjury, beyond question exists and is not a mere matter of belief or opinion, before they will grant the relief in such cases. . . .By the preponderance of authority it seems to be sufficient if the court has evidence before it which establishes the existence of the evidence relied on to show the perjury or mistake in such a clear and convincing manner as to leave no room for doubt as to the existence of the evidence so relied on, and the court is satisfied that the evidence is not collusive, that it seems to be true, and ought, if true, to produce on another trial an opposite result on the merits.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.