Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 133 Wash. 613 - Johnson v. Williams

Johnson v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1925

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 1954
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1954

10 state decisions

501925193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Samson v. Beale · Nelson v. Title Trust Co. · Yarnall v. Knickerbocker Co. · O'Daniel v. Streeby · Stanton v. St. Michell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““that is, as to identification of the property, . . . this seemingly upon the theory that an agency authority to find a purchaser necessarily means authority on the part of the agent to point out and identify the property to the prospective purchaser, recognizing, however, that this is quite a different thing from an agent’s untrue representation as to the quality of the property, as to its earning power or as to what is capable of being done with it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.