State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 2019
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · Reynolds v. Sims · New York v. United States · Pacific States Telephone Telegraph Company v. State of Oregon · State v. Thorne
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“after having been previously convicted of at least two other such crimes. Each defendant was therefore sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole under the Persistent Offender (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Davis“McKee v. City of Louisville, 200 Colo. 525 , 616 P.2d 969, 972 (1980). In sum, having conducted our own examination of the record, we agree with counsel's conclusion that the cases are”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Davis“`[T]he courtnot counselthen proceeds, after a full examination of all the proceedings, to decide whether the case is wholly frivolous.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hairston
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.