State v. Quintero Morelos’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on State v. Stenson · 101 Wash. 2d 481 - State v. Gore · 127 Wash. 2d 67 - Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc. · State v. Rohrich · State v. Bobic
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Well, the issue of whether it's 365 or 364 does not change the total time that he serves, it's just the total time that can be reimposed if he violates conditions. I can tell you in good conscience if I had known that that would make a difference, I would have imposed 364 days, because it doesn't change the number of days that he actually serves.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“needed to fairly resolve the issues on review,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“probably change the decision being reviewed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.