Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 ALA 429 - Willis v. State

Willis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1901

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
6
states following
March 2004
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 2004

23 state decisions

8019011910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thompson v. State of Missouri · Amos v. State · Ker v. People · Dennis v. State · Reeves v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The next important question raised upon the record is whether the prosecution could be compelled to elect to prosecute for one particular act of embezzlement. The evidence shows that the defendant was a station agent of the railroad company, and as such had full charge and control of its business at that station; Avas the custodian of all money arising out of the sale of tickets, collected all freight and express charges, made disbursements, and kept the books. Furthermore, the evidence tended to show that, by a system of false entries upon the books and other dubious practices, he endeavored to conceal his withholding of small sums of money which came into his possession from time to time by virtue of his employment; and, by a system of falsification, he managed to conceal * * * his acts of conversion of his employer’s money.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"If proof was made that $25 or more was embezzled, the crime is punishable as grand larceny is punished. . . ."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.