Webb v. Erickson’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Buckeye Cellulose Corp. v. Braggs Electric Construction Co. · Springfield Credit Union v. Johnson · 24 Ariz. App. 534 - Arizona State Department of Economic Security v. Mahoney · 27 Ariz. App. 771 - Price v. Sunmaster · 22 Ariz. App. 335 - Roll v. Janca
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On motion and upon such terms as are just the court may relieve a party ... from a final judgment, order or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence ...; (3) fraud ..., misrepresentation or other misconduct of an adverse party; (4) the judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied, released or discharged, or a prior judgment on which it is based has been reversed or otherwise vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have prospective application; or (6) any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment. The motion shall be filed within a reasonable time, and for reasons (1), (2) and (3) not more than six months after the judgment, or order was entered or proceeding was taken.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Webb v. Erickson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.