State v. Zuck’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
4 district · 89 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 95 later decisions — most recently October 2023 · most notably State v. Walton (1989), State v. Schrock (1986)
4 district · 89 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · State v. Valdez · Hance v. Georgia · State v. Clark · State v. Watson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court may prevent cross-examination into collateral matters of a personal nature having minor probative value.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Block v. Meyer · State v. Abdi“The existence of a derangement of the sort termed insanity is admissible to discredit, provided that it affected the witness at the time of the affair testified to or while on the stand or in the meantime so as to cripple his powers of recollection (citation omitted). Many psychiatric problems do not affect a witness’s credibility or capacity to observe and communicate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dumaine“when the issue of competency of trial counsel has been raised, we have always resolved the matter with whatever was before us in the record and without giving trial counsel an opportunity to be heard. However, we believe that in some cases where this issue is raised, it would be appropriate to remand the case for a hearing on the question.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.