Seale v. Owens’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2012
2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 28 U.S.C. § 1452 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Pacor Inc. v. Higgins · Matter of Wood v. P Wood & Pa · Browning v. Navarro · Thomasson v. AmSouth Bank, N.A. · O'ROURKE v. Cairns
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the motion must be made timely; (2) the claims must be based on state law and is [sic] only ‘related to’ the case under title 11; (3) the claim could not have been brought in federal court, absent the court’s bankruptcy jurisdiction; and (4) the court finds that a timely resolution of the claim can occur in state court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.