In Re Duque’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
December 1994
most recently cited
Relationships
Relies on Bonner v. City of Prichard · United States v. Nixon · Fisher v. United States · United States v. Dionisio · Edwin Hale v. William Henkel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“determine whether the subpoenas are unreasonable and oppressive within the meaning of Rule 45(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; in making this determination, the court shall balance the trustee’s interest in procuring the information against the burden imposed by appellants’ [ (Weintraub, Rodriguez, and now Karlan) ] compliance with the subpoenas, considering, inter alia, the need for and unavailability of the information and the danger inherent in subpoenaing criminal counsel regarding clients’ affairs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Duque
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.