Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 Cal. 301 - People v. Ward

People v. Ward’s Empirical Analysis

1901

Citation profile

111
cited by 111 later decisions
17
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

111 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 111 later decisions — most recently June 2010 · most notably 28 Cal. 2d 306 - People v. Peete (1946), 27 Cal. 2d 220 - People v. Williams (1945)

111 state decisions — followed in 17 states

200190119101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Lockwood · People v. Whiteman · People v. Martin · People v. Royce · People v. Bidleman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 111 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is contended that at the time the witness testified he had not been ‘ convicted of a felony ’; that to sustain the ruling of the court, it must be assumed, as a matter of law, that the verdict of guilty constituted a ‘ conviction ’. That such verdict does constitute a conviction, within the ordinary as well as the technical meaning of the word, seems to be well settled. Blackstone (book 4, p. 362), after speaking of the verdict of acquittal, says: ‘But if the jury find him guilty, he is then to be convicted of the crime whereof he stands indicted. Which conviction may accrue two ways: either by his confessing the offense and pleading guilty, or being found so by the verdict of his country. ’ ’’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.