Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 F.1d 237 - In re Lacov

In re Lacov’s Empirical Analysis

134 F. 237 · 1904

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
July 1932
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 1932

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

301904191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This method of taking testimony is the usual one in courts of equity, and tbe act does not provide that all tbe testimony shall be taken in tbe presence-of and bearing of tie judge.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.