In re Flanders’s Empirical Analysis
134 F. 560 · 1905
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 1963
4 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chickering v. Bastress · Lenz v. Harrison · In re Galt · Commercial National Bank of Pennsylvania v. Heilbronner · Peoria Manufacturing Co. v. Lyons ex rel. David Bradley Manufacturing Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The objections that ordinary invoices accompanied the shipments, that such shipments were made direct to Inlanders, that the leather was sold by him in his own name, that he allowed credit upon sales, that he guaranteed sales, and that he insured in his own name, do not change the nature of the transaction.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.