Zerres v. Vanina’s Empirical Analysis
134 F. 610 · 1905
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 1985
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Belk v. Meagher · Lessee James Ewing v. Jacob Burnet · Hammer v. Garfield Mining & Milling Co. · Book v. Justice Min. Co. · Strepey v. Stark
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * there is no provision in the section of the statute under consideration, ‘that a failure to comply with its terms will work a forfeiture.’ And in my opinion, the statute requiring the certificate of location to be recorded, when broadly and liberally interpreted, in order to secure the purposes for which it was enacted, is not susceptible of any such construction.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.