Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 F.1d 740 - Doroshow v. Ott

Doroshow v. Ott’s Empirical Analysis

134 F. 740 · 1905

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
November 1912
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Freeman v. Howe · Lathrop Assignee v. Drake et al. · Rouse v. Letcher · Stuart v. City of Easton · In re Russell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A suit in equity, commenced by a trustee in bankruptcy in a District Court against an adverse claimant of property to litigate tlie title thereto under authority of Bankr. Act July 1, 1898, § 67e ( 30 Stat. 5 (5-1, c. 541 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3419J), as amended by Act Feb. 5, 1903 ( 32 Stat. 800 , c. 487 [17. S. Comp. St. Supp. .1903, p. 4171), is not a, proceeding in bankruptcy, but an independent suit, and a decree or order therein is not subject to revision by the Circuit Court of Appeals under section 24b of the act ( 30 Stat. 553 [TJ. S. Comp. St. 3901, p. 3433]), although the District Court is also the court of bankruptcy administering the estate, and an injunction is also asked to restrain the defendant from prosecuting an action of replevin for the property in a state court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.