Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 F.1d 985 - Barber v. Lockwood

Barber v. Lockwood’s Empirical Analysis

134 F. 985 · 1905

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
January 1918
most recently cited

2 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Finlay McKinlay v. William Morrish

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The proprietor of a dock lias no right to invite a boat to use that berth for business purposes, when the situation is such that no work can be done there without exposing the boat to great danger from an existing defect, which could have been discovered and removed by the exercise of a fair degree of prudence. To permit so dangerous an object as the sunken spile to remain where any person has attempted to locate it constitutes a breach of duty and act of negligence for which the defendants must respond.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.