Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

134 F.2d 172

Docket No. 8222.

Tucker v. Norton

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued March 2, 1943.

Decided March 10, 1943.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1943-03-10

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1976

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Tucker v. Norton

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1943-03-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Louis Wagner, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Thomas J. Clary and Richard A. Smith,both of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellants.

¶2J. Barton Rettew, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa. (Gerald A. Gleeson, U. S. Atty., of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

¶3Before MARIS, JONES, and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The order of the district court denying the plaintiff’s motion for an interlocutory injunction to stay the enforcement of the compensation award made by the defendant is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Kalodner, 47 F.Supp. 762.

/134/f2d/172 · .json · Public domain