Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 F.2d 314 - Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Huffman

Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Huffman’s Empirical Analysis

134 F.2d 314 · 1943

Citation profile

83
cited by 83 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

43 federal appellate · 9 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2023 · most notably Cone v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co. (1947), Kern v. TXO Production Corp. (1984)

43 federal appellate · 9 district · 5 state decisions

280194319501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ford Motor Co. v. National Labor Relations Board · Jones v. Securities & Exchange Commission · In Re Skinner & Eddy Corporation · Pullman's Co v. Central Transp Co · Weathers v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If it were demonstrated that the defendant would lose the advantage which it now has by a change of forum that might be reason for holding that the court abused its discretion by permitting a dismissal without prejudice even had terms been imposed. In speaking of the result of a dismissal without prejudice by a plaintiff for the purpose of beginning a suit in another court, Judge Learned Hand in Young v. Southern Pac. Co., 2 Cir., 25 F.2d 630, 632 , said: ‘ * * * one court is as good as another. But the situation changes when there is substantial doubt whether the courts will not apply different rules, and when the plaintiff’s purpose is so to maneuver the litigation that the defendant will lose his existing advantage. The loss of the federal forum then becomes a grave prejudice, quite as much as, and indeed more than, the expense and delay in trying the suit up to decree, or even the failure of a cross-bill.’ ””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “an action shall not be dismissed at the plaintiff's instance save upon order of the court and upon such terms and conditions as the court deems proper.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Judicial discretion is variously defined. The sense in which the term is commonly used is defined in 1 Bouv. Law Diet., Rawle’s Third Revision, page 884, as ‘The power exercised by courts to determine questions to which no strict rule of law is applicable but which, from their nature, and the circumstances of the case, are controlled by the personal judgment of the court.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.