Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 F.3d 1054 - Paladino v. Avnet Computer Technologies, Inc.

Paladino v. Avnet Computer Technologies, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

134 F.3d 1054 · 1998

Citation profile

195
cited by 195 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
12
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

65 federal appellate · 6 district · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 195 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2021 · most notably 24 Cal. 4th 83 - Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc. (2000), PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc. v. Book (2003)

65 federal appellate · 6 district · 33 state decisions — followed in 12 states

11701998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 9 U.S.C. § 1 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 16 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 2 · 9 U.S.C. § 3 · 9 U.S.C. § 4

Relies on Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co. · Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc · First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp. · Volt Information Sciences Inc v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 195 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “completely proscribes an arbitral award of Title VII damages”
    21 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “creates a presumption in favor of arbitrability; so, parties must clearly express their intent to exclude categories of claims from their arbitration agreement.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A written provision . . . to settle by arbitration a controversy . . . shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.