Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 F.3d 1297 - Dunphy v. McKee

Dunphy v. McKee’s Empirical Analysis

134 F.3d 1297 · 1998

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
March 2020
most recently cited

25 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently March 2020 · most notably United States v. Collington (2006), Grun v. Pneumo Abex Corp. (1998)

25 federal appellate ·

2701998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Cuyler v. Sullivan · Link v. Wabash Railroad · Ferri v. Ackerman · Ball v. City of Chicago · Farmer v. Haas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “only in extreme situations, when there is a clear record of delay or contumacious conduct, or when other less drastic sanctions have proven unavailable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the usual assumptions about the agency relationship between the lawyer and client must be relaxed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “abuse of discretion review is not the same thing as a rubber stamp”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.