Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 F.3d 1339 - Doe v. Hartz Doe

Doe v. Hartz Doe’s Empirical Analysis

134 F.3d 1339 · 1998

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 7 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Hishon v. King & Spalding · Jean v. Nelson · Brian Dale Bramlet v. James A. Wilson · Carlon v. Thaman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an act or series of acts that would constitute a felony against the person . . . and that would come within the meaning of State or Federal offenses described in section 16 of Title 18.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “we cannot simply borrow the federal classification of a felony and apply it to conduct that could not constitute a crime under federal law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “who commits a crime of violence motivated by gender.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.