Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 F.3d 1362 - Olinger v. Larson

Olinger v. Larson’s Empirical Analysis

134 F.3d 1362 · 1998

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Liebe v. Norton (1998), Pitt v. District of Columbia (2007)

10 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

170199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Beck v. State of Ohio · Paul v. Davis · Gerstein v. Pugh · Baker v. McCollan · Patterson v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The City cannot be liable . . . whether on a failure to train theory or a municipal custom or policy theory, unless [an officer] is found liable on the underlying substantive claim.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a]n officer has probable cause to make a warrantless arrest when facts known to the officer are sufficient to make a reasonably prudent officer believe that the suspect is committing or has committed an offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.