Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 F.3d 309 - Jones v. Johnson

Jones v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

134 F.3d 309 · 1998

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
August 2018
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2018

5 federal appellate ·

70199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lindh v. Murphy · United States v. Raddatz · Gomez v. United States · Peretz v. United States · Holiday v. Johnston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Generally, in a case in which the parties have not consented to have the case proceed before a magistrate judge, a magistrate judge may determine pretrial matters, conduct evidentiary hearings, and file proposed findings and recommendations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Lawson v. Stephens
  2. “Article III judges cannot delegate to magistrate judges final authority over some important issue in a case, as only Article III judges, not their adjuncts, have the power to dispose of cases or controversies.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Lawson v. Stephens
  3. “a CPC issued by a magistrate judge is ineffective to confer jurisdiction on this court where the district judge has conclusively ceded to the magistrate judge the role of deciding whether a CPC shall issue”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. Lawson v. Stephens

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.