Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 F.3d 668 - In Re Asbestos Litigation

In Re Asbestos Litigation’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2010

1 state decisions

30199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362

Relies on Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor · General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon · Hansberry v. Lee · Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts · Jerome Grubart Inc v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company City of Chicago

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “One or more members of a class action may sue or be sued as representative parties on behalf of all only if (1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable, (2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class, (3) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class, and (4) the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.