Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 F.3d 721 - Hypes ex rel. Hypes v. First Commerce Corp.

Hypes ex rel. Hypes v. First Commerce Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

134 F.3d 721 · 1998

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
August 2024
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably United States ex rel. Willard v. Humana Health Plan of Texas Inc. (2003), Seaman v. CSPH, Inc. (1999)

31 federal appellate · 4 district ·

3201998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Foman v. Davis · Tyndall v. National Education Centers, Inc. · Vande Zande v. State of Wisconsin Department of Administration R · Baker v. Putnal · Bienkowski v. American Airlines, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]f plaintiff lacks evidence sufficient to create a genuine issue of fact in support of a necessary element of a claim or claims, then summary judgment is appropriate against plaintiff on that claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[Rjegular attendance is an essential function of most jobs.”); Tyndall v. Nat'l Educ. Ctrs., Inc. of Cal., 31 F.3d 209 , 213 (4th Cir.1994) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the [plaintiff] bears the burden of proving that the [defendant’s] actions were motivated by the considerations prohibited by the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.