Smith v. Luna

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided June 17, 2005

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2005-06-17

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Willie Lee Miles v. Kw Prunty Attorney General of the State of California

Decided 2005-06-17

¶1MEMORANDUM …

¶2Alaska state prisoner Ruple Marx Smith appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253.

¶3Reviewing de novo, Miles v. Prunty, 187 F.3d 1104, 1105 (9th Cir.1999), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

¶4AFFIRMED.

¶5 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.