134 F. Supp. 2d 103 - MacK v. Strauss’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
30
cited by 30 later decisions
March 2018
most recently cited
28 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson · Monge v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a tangible impact on the terms and conditions” of plaintiff's employment). 2 . The Court notes that the Plaintiff's lawsuit was filed on July 13, 1998 and therefore her claim regarding the 1999 incident is not before the Court. The Plaintiff has not amended or moved to amend her complaint since filing this suit. The scope of Title VII claims in a civil action depends on the underlying EEO complaint.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“not accompanied by some other adverse change in the terms, conditions or privileges of employment,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“increased workload does not constitute an actionable injury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.