Jacoby v. Jacoby’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) Financial resources of the parties; (2) Ability of the party seeking support and. maintenance to meet his or her needs independently; (3) Duration of the marriage; (4) Standard of living established during the marriage; (5) Age of the parties; (6) Physical and emotional condition of the parties; (7) Usual occupation of the parties during the marriage; (8) Vocational skills and employability of the party seeking support and maintenance; (9) Needs of the parties; (10) Custodial and child support responsibilities; (11) Ability of the party from whom support and maintenance is sought to meet his or her own needs while meeting the needs of the party seeking support and maintenance; (12) Other factors which measure the financial condition in which the parties will be left as the result of the action under which the determination of maintenance is made; and (13) Probable duration of the need of the party seeking support and maintenance.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Gordon v. Gordon.

2. “7 The Family Court ordered that Bennett pay $14,666.40 in interest on his post-decree payment to Nicoleta of $594,805. The interest was calculated by multiplying $162.96 per day by 90 days. 134 Hawai#i at 439 n.5, 341 P.3d at 1239 n.5. On remand, the Family Court confirmed this in FOF/COL 28, noting that Bennett delivered $594,805 to Nicoleta,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Jacoby v. Jacoby

3. “Court improperly failed to account for the parties' respective checking and savings accounts as part of the final property equalization calculation . . . [and failed] to include these accounts in its final calculations.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. Jacoby v. Jacoby