State v. Lundquist’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
February 2016
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · State v. Toohill · State v. Hedger · State v. Sanchez · State v. Broadhead
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where a sentence is within the statutory limits, the appellant bears the burden of demonstrating that it is a clear abuse of discretion. To constitute an abuse of discretion, the sentence must be shown to be excessive under any reasonable view of the facts. A sentence is reasonable if at the time of imposition it appears necessary to achieve the primary objective of protecting society and to achieve any or all of the related goals of deterrence, rehabilitation or retribution applicable to the given case. For the purpose of sentencing review, this Court considers the minimum period of incarceration to be the probable measure of confinement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gertsch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.