134 Ind. App. 12 - McBride v. GRIFFITH’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““It is now established by.the judicial decisions of this state that an indulgent vendor, who consistently fails to require of the vendee compliance with the contractual provisions existing between himself and the vendee, thereby waives the provisions of the contract making the time of payment of the essence thereof and casts upon him the duty to give definite and specific notice to the buyer that he will be indulgent no longer and has a present intent to make full use of the forfeiture provisions in the contract unless the delinquent installments are paid within a specified but reasonable time. Clayton v. Fletcher Savings & Trust Co. (1927), 89 Ind. App. 431, 434 , 155 N.E. 539 ; Baker v. Eades (1930), 90 Ind. App. 664 , 169 N.E. 686 ; Chambers v. Boatright (1961), [132] Ind. App. [378], 177 N.E.2d 600, 603 . . .” (Our emphasis.)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 170 Ind. App. 101 - Nelson v. Butcher