Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 Ind. App. 336 - HECK v. Selig

134 Ind. App. 336 - HECK v. Selig’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
September 2004
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wayne Pike Co. v. Hammons · Silvestro v. Walz · Lesh v. Johnston Furniture Co. · Hutts v. Martin · 84 Ind. App. 676 - Christ v. Jovanoff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule is well established in this state that parties must recover upon the allegations of the pleadings. They must recover secundum allegata et probata, or not at all. This is the only reasonable rule under our practice. It would be folly to require the plaintiff to state his cause of action in his complaint and the defendant disclose his defense in the answer, if, on the trial, either or both might abandon such allegations and recover upon other facts which are substantially different from those alleged. A variance is a departure from the allegations of the pleadings in some particular or particulars and an attempt to prove different facts from those alleged.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.