Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 134 INDAPP 569 - Kruzick v. Pelkey

Kruzick v. Pelkey’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1979
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Greathouse v. McKinney · Stout v. Stout · 121 Ind. App. 608 - Rayl v. General Motors Corp. · 123 Ind. App. 660 - Quigley v. Ackerman, Admr., Etc. · Oertling v. Oertling

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““APPEALS — Any person considering himself aggrieved by any decision of a court having probate jurisdiction in proceedings under this code may prosecute an appeal to the court having jurisdiction of such appeal. Such appeal shall be taken as appeals are taken in civil causes. Executors, administrators, guardians and fiduciaries may have a stay of proceedings without bond.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.